Legal Opinion

Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 15, 1963No. 16479_1PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAZELON, Chief Judge.

In a rate proceeding under § 4(e) of the Natural Gas Act,1 the Federal Power Commission allowed Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company an over-all return of 6.25 per cent on its total rate base, reflecting a rate of return of 1.5 percent on $11,000,000 of investment from its reserves for deferred income taxes. In this petition for review, Panhandle’s only complaint relates to the rate allowed on the reserves.

*661These reserves are generated by Panhandle’s use of § 167 of the Internal Revenue Code2 which authorizes taxpayers to write off depreciable property more quickly than is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Detroit v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
  2. El Paso Natural Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Williams v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1968
  2. Alabama-Tennessee Natural Gas Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  3. New England Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  4. City of Chicago v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  5. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API