Legal Opinion

Fleming v. Galipeau

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided June 28, 2021No. 3:20-cv-00845Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION GREGORY P. FLEMING, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:20-CV-845-RLM-MGG GALIPEAU, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Gregory P. Fleming, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a motion to amend his complaint and a proposed amended complaint. ECF 10; ECF 10-1. The court will permit the amendment (a motion wasn’t necessary because under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1)(B), Mr. Fleming may amend “once as a matter of course . . ..”). “A document filed pro se is to be liberally construed, and a pro se complaint, however…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API