Fleming v. Galipeau
District Court, N.D. Indiana
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION GREGORY P. FLEMING, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:20-CV-845-RLM-MGG GALIPEAU, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Gregory P. Fleming, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a motion to amend his complaint and a proposed amended complaint. ECF 10; ECF 10-1. The court will permit the amendment (a motion wasn’t necessary because under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15(a)(1)(B), Mr. Fleming may amend “once as a matter of course . . ..”). “A document filed pro se is to be liberally construed, and a pro se complaint, however…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institution at Walpole v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.