Legal Opinion

Importers & Traders' National Bank v. Shaw

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 9, 1887PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtW. Allen, J.

This is an action against Fayette Shaw and Brackley Shaw, as copartners under the name of F. Shaw and Brothers, as indorsers of four promissory notes. No service was made on Brackley Shaw, who was out of the Commonwealth, and the action proceeded against Fayette Shaw alone. The demand was made upon the makers of each note, and notice of its non-payment was duly sent by mail to the indorsers, addressed to the firm in Boston. The only question is whether there was evidence upon which the judge, who tried the case without a jury, could find that the notices so addressed were sufficient.

Fayette…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bank of Utica v. PhillipsNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  2. Bank of America v. ShawMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
  3. Rowland v. RoweSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1880

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wachusett National Bank v. FairbrotherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  2. Hobbs v. StraineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  3. Lamkin v. EdgerlyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API