Legal Opinion

State v. Yates

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1965PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodwin, J.

Defendant appeals a conviction of violating ORS 163.210 (rape of female under 16 years of age).

We are asked to set aside the conviction on the ground that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict.

The only evidence that an act of intercourse occurred was the testimony of the prosecutrix. In this state, however, the testimony of the prosecutrix alone is sufficient to sustain a conviction. State v. Friddles, 62 Or 209, 123 P 904 (1912).

The testimony of the girl was impeached by proof that the day before the trial, in an interview with defense counsel, the prosecutrix said that there…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. FriddlesOregon Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. JorgensenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  2. Krause v. Eugene Dodge, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Taylor v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  4. State v. HarwoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. State v. BashawOregon Supreme Court · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API