In re the Detention of Strand
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentSanders, J.
¶24 (dissenting) — The majority claims the sexually violent predator (SVP) statute, chapter 71.09 RCW, “authorizes a prefiling psychological examination,” majority at 187; however John Strand is not entitled to representation at his examination notwithstanding former RCW 71.09.050 (1995), which guarantees the right to an attorney “[a]t all stages of the proceedings under this chapter . . . .”
¶25 The majority opines, in circular fashion, there is no right to a voluntariness hearing in a “voluntary prefiling psychological interview.” Majority at 192. And because this is a “civil” incarceration,…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.