Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Seamans

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided July 15, 1986No. Civ. A. B-85-1553-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

COBB, District Judge.

The matters now before the court arise from motions for dismissal of a 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983, 1985, 1986, and 1988 claims, as well as state law claims. The motions, being convincing under the law and the facts, are granted in their entirety.

This case was filed on November 13, 1985, on behalf of the surviving wife, son and parents of Larry Taylor. Plaintiffs named R.W. Seamans, the State of Texas, the Texas Department of Public Safety, James B. Adams, Hardin County, H.R. “Mike” Holzapfel, C. Smith, and Dale Freeman as defendants to this action. Service…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  3. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jolly v. KleinDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1996
  2. Astley v. Bekins Van Lines Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API