White v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, Judge.
This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment.
United Parcel Service, Inc. (UPS) brought this action, seeking a declaratory judgment that it was not subject to taxation pursuant to Ala.Code (1975), §§ 40-21-60 and -61. The trial court, after an ore terms hearing, ruled in favor of UPS.
The Commissioner of Revenue appeals, and we affirm.
The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in finding that UPS was not an “express company” within the meaning of Ala.Code (1975), §§ 40-21-60 and -61. The statutes in question provide for a tax on all “express companies” doing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ross v. LutonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1984
- Alsop v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1889
- Pfister v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Pacific Exp. Co. v. SeibertU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1890
- American Ry. Exp. Co. v. WrightMississippi Supreme Court · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Harrah's Entertainment, Inc. v. Ace American InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Ex Parte DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
- State v. TurnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989