Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Turnbull Elevator, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 31, 1967No. 43102PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Felton, Chief Judge.

Specifications of negligence (a), (b) and (d) relate to the defendant Atlanta Federal Savings & Loan Association, called the bank for the sake of brevity, and spec^ ification (c) relates to Turnbull Elevator, Inc., called the elevator company for convenience. The petition sets forth a cause of action against both defendants. The sole questions for decision are whether the allegations were pierced by the motions for summary judgment and documents in support thereof and whether such showings require the conclusion of non-negligence as a matter of law. The pleadings were not…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Holland v. Sanfax CorporationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. ReevesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Hubbard v. Macon Railway & Light Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  4. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Davis & BrandonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
  5. Pinkerton's, Inc. v. Palmer, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lane v. Montgomery Elevator Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  2. Gaffney v. EQK Realty InvestorsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  3. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. N. A., Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  4. BBB SERVICE CO., INC. v. GlassCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Saltis v. A.B.B. Daimler BenzCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API