Thompson v. Mann
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
This is the third appeal involving Road Improvement District No. 10 of Pulaski County. In the case of Cumnock v. Alexander, 139 Ark. 153, the validity of act No. 436 of the regular 1919 session of the General Assembly creating the district was upheld. At the extra session of the General Assembly acts were passed which changed the plans of the improvement by adding certain roads to be improved and by eliminating one of the subdistricts. The statute as amended provided for the improvement, in subdistrict No. 6, of a road designated as the Perryville road, beginning in the city of Little Rock at…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bennett v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- Cox v. Road Improvement District No. 8Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Nall v. KelleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Reitzammer v. Desha Road Improvement District No. 2Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
- Cumnock v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Barton v. Drainage District No. 30Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1927