Tortat v. Hardin Min. & Mfg. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Dakota
On Motion to Remand to State Court, and on Motion to Set Aside or Vacate Service of Process.
1Opinion of the Court
CARLAND, District Judge.
On the 25th day of July, 1901, Henry A. Tortat commenced an action ill the circuit court, for the county of Lawrence, state of South Dakota, against the Hardin Mining & Manufacturing Company, wherein the plaintiff sought to recover from the defendant the sum of $11,000, with interest at the rate of 7 per cent, per annum from July I, 1901. The plaintiff claimed to be a creditor of the defendant company in the amount stated by reason of an assignment to him by one James D. Hardin of certain indebtedness claimed to he due from the defendant company to said James D. Hardin…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wabash Western Railway v. BrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- The St. Louis & Sandoval Coal & Mining Co. v. Sandoval Coal & Mining Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1884
- St. Louis & Sandoval Coal & Mining Co. v. EdwardsIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
- Hemmer v. WolfedIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
- Youtsey v. HoffmanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1901
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bramwell v. OwenDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1921
- Boston Acme Mines Development Co. v. ClawsonUtah Supreme Court · 1925
- Flint v. CoffinCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1910
- Consolidated Iron & Steel Co. v. Maumee Iron & Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
- John W. Masury & Son v. LowtherMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.