Legal Opinion
Lentini v. Urbancic
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided October 26, 2005No. Docket 246323PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON REMAND
Before: SMOLENSKI, P.J., and WHITE and KELLY, JJ. Smolenski, P.J.
In Lentini v Urbancic, 262 Mich App 552; 686 NW2d 510 (2004) (Lentini I), we affirmed the trial court’s grant of summary disposition for defendants under MCR 2.116(C)(7). However, in lieu of granting leave to appeal, our Supreme Court vacated the decision in Lentini I and remanded the case to this Court for reconsideration in light of Waltz v Wyse, 469 Mich 642; 677 NW2d 813 (2004). Lentini v Urbancic, 472 Mich 885 (2005) (Lentini II). On remand, we again affirm the trial court’s decision to grant summary disposition.
Pla…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Waltz v. WyseMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Ousley v. McLarenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- Farley v. Advanced Cardiovascular Health Specialists, PCMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
- Lentini v. UrbancicMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Lentini v. UrbancicMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mazumder v. University of Michigan Board of RegentsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Ward v. SianoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
- Est of Wanda Jesse v. Lakeland Specialty Hosp at Berrien CenterMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
- Mazumder v. University of Michigan Board of RegentsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006