Legal Opinion
United Transports, Inc. v. Jett
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 21, 1943No. 31105PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.
Josephine Jett instituted an action in the district court of Creek county, to recover damages from'United Transports, Inc., arising from injuries alleged to have been suffered as a result of a collision between an automobile wherein she was riding and a truck owned by United, and she joined as a party defendant, American Fidelity & Casualty Company, the bondsmen for United, under authority of Temple v. Dugger, 164 Okla. 84, 21 P. 2d 482.'She recovered a judgment upon the verdict of the jury for $10,000 against United, and $5,000 against American, and they appeal.
The first contention presented…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Temple v. DuggerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- American Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Hale-Halsell Co. v. WebbSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Holcombe & Hoke Mfg. Co. v. WatersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
3Cited by8 opinions
- Snowden v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
- Mulkey v. MorrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Labor Investment Corporation v. RussellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Midwestern Engine and Equipment Co. v. ChildersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1957
- Tulsa Fruit Co. v. LucasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.