Legal Opinion
Seipel v. Sevek
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 9, 1958PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
53 N.J. Super. 151 (1958)
146 A.2d 705
CHARLES SEIPEL, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
CHARLES SEVEK AND MELBA SILVERMAN, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND ROLAND K. THEN, HERBERT M. THEN, CIRIOCO SCOPPETTUOLO AND PONTIAC CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 27, 1958.
Decided December 9, 1958.
Before Judges GOLDMANN, CONFORD and HANEMAN.
Mr. Merritt Lane, Jr., argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. McCarter, English & Studer, attorneys).
Mr. Edward M. Gurry argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Edward M. Gurry and Messrs.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Menth v. Breeze Corporation, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Melone v. Jersey Central Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Bacak v. HogyaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Taneian v. MeghrigianSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
- Bianchi v. South Park Presbyterian ChurchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1939
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Pabon v. Hackensack Auto Sales, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Nat'l Prem. Budget Plan Corp. v. Nat'l Fire Ins.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- Tabor v. O'GRADYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Demetro v. PENN. RRNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
- Michael Saporito v. Holland-America LinesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960