Legal Opinion

In re the Accounting of Hammond

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided September 18, 1944PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Vandermeulen, S.

At the hearing on February 2, 1943, this court, on motion, struck out objection number two. That part of objection number three, reading as follows, “ and should not have been paid until the claims of the creditors of the estate were paid and then an allowance made in open court by the Surrogate after hearing the interested parties ” was stricken out. Objections number five, six and seven were stricken out, with the understanding that any question arising may still be brought up under the claim for widow’s exemption. Objection number one is dismissed. Objection number four is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of RothsteinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  2. In re the Estate of TurnerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1942

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of HowellNew York Surrogate's Court · 1947
  2. Moloney Funeral Home, Inc. v. GurnellNew York Supreme Court · 1965
  3. In re the Accounting of RosenblumNew York Surrogate's Court · 1958
  4. In re the Estate of GarrettNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API