Legal Opinion

General Building Contractors v. City of Syracuse

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 6, 1972PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law and facts, with costs, and judgment granted in favor of petitioner in accordance with the following Memorandum: Bid specifications insofar as they require the general contractor’s superintendent to correlate all the work on the job, the separate prime contractors to coordinate their work schedules with that of the general contractor, and hold the general contractor responsible for setting the pace for the job and for all work in place are violative of section 101 of the General Municipal Law (see Matter of General Bldg. Contrs. v. County of Oneida, 54…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. General Building Contractors of New York State, Inc. v. County of OneidaNew York Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dobson v. Rutgers, State UniversityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  2. Empire State Chapter of Associated Builders & Contractors v. City of OswegoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. J. A. Valenti Electric Co. v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  4. Edenwald Contracting Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API