Brixen v. United States
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN EDMUND J. BRIXEN, Petitioner, ORDER v. 20-cv-147-wmc1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. Movant Edmund J. Brixen seeks relief under
28 U.S.C. § 2255
following his guilty plea to one count of production of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a). Brixen contends that his conviction was invalid because he received ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel. I must review the motion under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings. Rule 4 authorizes me to dismiss a motion to vacate…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Day v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Clay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Dodd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. James Marcello and Anthony ZizzoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.