Legal Opinion

Brixen v. United States

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided November 22, 2022No. 3:20-cv-00147Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN EDMUND J. BRIXEN, Petitioner, ORDER v. 20-cv-147-wmc1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent. Movant Edmund J. Brixen seeks relief under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

following his guilty plea to one count of production of child pornography, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a). Brixen contends that his conviction was invalid because he received ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel. I must review the motion under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Proceedings. Rule 4 authorizes me to dismiss a motion to vacate…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Day v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Clay v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Dodd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. United States v. James Marcello and Anthony ZizzoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API