Legal Opinion
Samuels v. Acme Market
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 18, 1994No. Civ. A. 93-5524PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JAMES MeGIRR KELLY, District Judge.
Presently before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss of the Resolution Trust Corporation (“RTC”), acting in its capacity as receiver for Bell Federal Savings (“Bell Savings”). RTC requests that the Court dismiss Plaintiffs Charlotte and Jack Samuels’ complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1). RTC claims the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction to determine these claims prior to the plaintiffs’ exhaustion of the administrative remedies set forth in 12 U.S.C. § 1821(d)(3) — (13) (1989).
Facts and Procedural History
The accident…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rosa v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Mountain Ridge State Bank, in Receivership v. Shain, Schaffer & RafanelloCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Ncnb Texas National Bank v. Candice Beth Cowden and Billi Terresa CowdenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Decrosta v. Red Carpet Inns International, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
- FDIC v. DiStefanoDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1993
3Cited by7 opinions
- National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa v. City SavingsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Summerhaze Company v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationUtah Supreme Court · 2014
- Gilliam v. Hi-Temp Products, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- National Union Fire Insurance v. City Savings, F.S.B.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Gilliam v. Hi-Temp Products Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.