Legal Opinion

United States v. Lo Curto

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 19, 1929No. 3180Published

1Opinion of the Court

Hatfield, Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of the court:

This is an appeal from the United States Customs Court.

Merchandise known as whiteoline and consisting of a chemical compound — copper sulphocyanide (CuCNS) — was assessed for duty by the collector as a chemical compound at 25 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 5 of the Tariff Act of 1922, which reads as follows:

Par. 5. All chemical elements, all chemical salts and compounds, all medicinal preparations, and all combinations and mixtures of any of the foregoing, all the foregoing obtained naturally or artificially and not specially provided…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Strohmeyer & Arpe Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. United States v. Davies, Turner & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API