State v. Hastings
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtShangraw, C.J.
(Ret.), Assigned. The respondent, Henry Hastings, was charged by information with disturbing the peace by use of the telephone pursuant to 13 V.S.A. § 1027. He was tried by jury and found guilty of eleven counts of violating 13 V.S.A. § 1027 in the District Court of Vermont, Unit No. 3, Lamoille Circuit.
Conviction under the statute requires a tripartite showing of the basic elements. The prosecution must present evidence demonstrating the use of a telephone by one who, with an intent to terrify, intimidate, threaten, harass, or annoy, makes a request, suggestion, or proposal which is obscene,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. CioccaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
- State v. Coomer, Jr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1933
- State v. RyeaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
- State v. DrakeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
- State v. KoettingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. PattersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
- State v. YeargainMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996