Legal Opinion

State v. Hastings

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided December 12, 1974No. 111-72PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShangraw, C.J.

(Ret.), Assigned. The respondent, Henry Hastings, was charged by information with disturbing the peace by use of the telephone pursuant to 13 V.S.A. § 1027. He was tried by jury and found guilty of eleven counts of violating 13 V.S.A. § 1027 in the District Court of Vermont, Unit No. 3, Lamoille Circuit.

Conviction under the statute requires a tripartite showing of the basic elements. The prosecution must present evidence demonstrating the use of a telephone by one who, with an intent to terrify, intimidate, threaten, harass, or annoy, makes a request, suggestion, or proposal which is obscene,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. CioccaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
  2. State v. Coomer, Jr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1933
  3. State v. RyeaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1923
  4. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1974
  5. State v. DrakeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  2. State v. KoettingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. State v. PattersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. State v. YeargainMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API