Legal Opinion

Pearson v. Van Antwerp Realty Corporation

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 19, 1935No. 1 Div. 883PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

The first and second counts of the complaint are for the breach of a covenant embodied in a contract entered into between the plaintiff and Mrs. Van Antwerp, in June, 1920, in respect to taking down and reconstructing a party wall between the buildings of the plaintiff and Mrs. Van Antwerp, at that time coterminous properties. The obligation assumed by the covenant, the breach of which is the basis of said counts, was that in rebuilding the party wall, the building of the plaintiff was to be adjoined and made fast to the new wall by proper brackets or other structures in such…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Girard Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. GunnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  2. Elmore, Quillian & Co. v. Parrish Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Doullut Williams v. HoffmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  4. Life Casuality Ins. Co. of Tennessee v. Crow.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1935
  5. Hunt v. Preferred Accident Ins.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Evans v. Town of Muscle ShoalsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. Board of Education of Randolph County v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API