Legal Opinion
Peak Investments v. South Peak Homeowners Ass'n
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 28, 2006No. G035851PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SILLS, P. J.
South Peak Homeowners Association (the Association) appeals from the trial court’s order granting a homeowner’s petition to reduce the percentage of homeowner votes needed to approve an amendment to the declaration of covenants, conditions, and restrictions (CC&R’s). The Association claims the trial court improperly reduced the percentage to less than a simple majority of the homeowner votes. We find the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act (Civ. Code, § 1350 et seq.) requires that a proposed amendment to the CC&R’s be approved by at least a simple majority of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Smith v. Rae-Venter Law GroupCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Villa De Las Palmas Homeowners Ass'n v. TerifajCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Blue Lagoon Community Assn. v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
3Cited by8 opinions
- Fourth La Costa Condominium Owners Ass'n v. SeithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Giammarrusco v. SimonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Quail Lakes Owners Ass'n v. KozinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Mission Shores Assn. v. PheilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Orchard Estate Homes, Inc. v. Orchard Homeowner Alliance, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.