Jenkins v. AMERICAN EXPRESS FINANCIAL CORP.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HALBROOKS, Judge.
Relator challenges the decision by the senior-unemployment-review judge (SURJ), affirming a decision by the unemployment-law judge (ULJ), that she was disqualified from receiving unemployment benefits because she was discharged for misconduct. Although relator was eligible for work release under Minn.Stat. § 631.425 (2002) while she was incarcerated, the ULJ found that her employer was not obligated to call and verify her employment in order to allow her continued attendance at work. Relator argues that the employer’s failure to call and verify her employment under…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- White v. Metropolitan Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Ress v. Abbott Northwestern Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Windsperger v. Broadway Liquor OutletSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Markel v. City of Circle PinesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- McGowan v. Executive Express Transportation Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jenkins v. American Express Financial Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Jenkins v. AMERICAN EXPRESS FINANCIAL CORP.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005
- Jenkins v. American Express Financial Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006