Legal Opinion

Frenklyn Piggie v. Warden, FCI-Texarkana

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided March 24, 2026No. 5:25-cv-00019Unknown

1Opinion

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TEXARKANA DIVISION FRENKLYN PIGGIE § § Petitioner § § v. § Case No. 5:25cv19-JRG-JBB § WARDEN, FCI-TEXARKANA § § Respondent § ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Petitioner Frenklyn Piggie, proceeding pro se, filed the above-styled and numbered petition for the writ of habeas corpus under

28 U.S.C. § 2241

challenging the application of time credits to his sentence and purportedly seeking a “statutory interpretation.” The case was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636. Petitioner…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Chrysler Corp. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. BenbrookCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  4. Handley v. ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  5. Palomino v. Federal Bureau of PrisonsDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API