Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. Keller

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 2000No. 20000225PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

[¶ 1] The Disciplinary Board petitions for disciplinary action against Michael E. Keller. After Keller failed to respond to a motion for order of default, the Hearing Panel of the Disciplinary Board issued an order for default. We decline to adopt the findings and recommendations of the Hearing Panel and remand to allow Keller an opportunity to bring a motion to vacate the default order and to present evidence demonstrating a lack of notice.

I

[¶ 2] Michael E. Keller was admitted to practice law in North Dakota on October 10, 1984. A summons and a petition for discipline were personally served…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re the Application for Disciplinary Action Against DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State v. LeierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. DooleyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Disciplinary Board v. GrayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Disciplinary Action Against DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. SwansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against KellerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. MarshallNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of North Dakota v. KellerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. In Re Disciplinary Action Against SwansonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API