Legal Opinion

State v. Teat

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 17, 1974No. 7427SC480PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROCK, Chief Judge.

It is clear that Judge McLean undertook to vacate a judgment and set aside a verdict rendered during a session of court which had long since expired.

All matters pending before the court are in fieri during the session. During the session at which a criminal case is tried, the court has power to vacate the judgment, set aside the verdict and order a new trial. With two exceptions, after the expiration of the session at which the case is tried, such power does not exist in criminal cases. The two exceptions are: where the case is kept alive by appeal, a motion for a new trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. NeelyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  2. State v. . McLambSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  3. State v. CagleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. TeatCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. UpshurCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  3. State v. TeatSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API