State v. Teat
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BROCK, Chief Judge.
It is clear that Judge McLean undertook to vacate a judgment and set aside a verdict rendered during a session of court which had long since expired.
All matters pending before the court are in fieri during the session. During the session at which a criminal case is tried, the court has power to vacate the judgment, set aside the verdict and order a new trial. With two exceptions, after the expiration of the session at which the case is tried, such power does not exist in criminal cases. The two exceptions are: where the case is kept alive by appeal, a motion for a new trial…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. NeelyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. . McLambSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- State v. CagleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. TeatCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975
- State v. UpshurCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- State v. TeatSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974