Legal Opinion

Sargeant v. Marshall

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 8, 1890PublishedCited by 2 opinions

In error to the Circuit Court of Knox County; the lion. Arthur A. Smith, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtC. B. Smith, P. J.

This was a suit in replevin brought by plaintiff in error against defendant in error to recover the possession of a span of horses. On a trial below the plaintiff was defeated, and he now brings the case here on error, and assigns the usual errors. This case was before ns at a former term and was then reversed and remanded for a new trial. The case will be found reported in the case of Sargeant v. Marshall, 28 Ill. App. 177, where the facts connected with the transaction are fully stated.

It is earnestly urged that this verdict is not sustained by the evidence. Inasmuch as the judgment will be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roth v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  2. Robertson v. BrostIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  3. O'Neall v. CalhounIllinois Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Sargeant v. MarshallAppellate Court of Illinois · 1888

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thornton v. MuusAppellate Court of Illinois · 1905
  2. McElroy v. Catholic Press Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API