Legal Opinion

Raich v. Truax

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided January 7, 1915No. E-9PublishedCited by 11 opinions

In Equity. Suit by Mike Raich against William Truax, Sr., and others. On application for a temporary injunction pendente lite. •

1Opinion of the Court

SAWTELLE, District Judge.

This is an application for a temporary injunction pendente lite to restrain the Attorney General of the state of Arizona and the county attorney of Cochise county, Ariz., from enforcing a law enacted by vote of the people of that state, under an initiative petition, on November 3, 1914, upon the ground that the law is in violation of the Constitution of the United States, and the hearing thereof is had under section 266 of the Judicial Code.

[ 1 ] The act in question is entitled:

“An act to nrotect the citizens oí the United. States in their employment against…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  4. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Harris v. State Board of Optometrical ExaminersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Terrace v. ThompsonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1921
  3. Marcus Brown Holding Co. v. PollakDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1920
  4. Best Foods, Inc. v. WelchDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1929
  5. Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API