Legal Opinion

People v. South Shore Amusements, Inc.

Nassau County District Court

Decided July 11, 1975PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I. Stanley Rosenthal J.

The defendant is charged in eight separate informations with violating subdivision D of section 105-3 of the Town of Hempstead Ordinances, in that it operated certain mechanical rides in violation of that section.

Chapter 105 of the Town of Hempstead Ordinances, as stated in section 105-1, was re-enacted to "protect the residents of the Town of Hempstead and the public at large from nuisances and hazards which result from the unregulated operation of bazaars, carnivals, circuses, fairs and other amusements of a similar type.” (Emphasis added.) The chapter provides…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Defiance Milk Products Co. v. Du MondNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. Hecht v. MonaghanNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Matter of Elite Dairy Products v. Ten EyckNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  4. Good Humor Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. People v. ScottNew York Court of Appeals · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. International Service Agencies v. O'SheaNew York Supreme Court · 1980
  2. People v. NewtonNew York District Court · 1978
  3. People v. South Shore Amusements, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API