Legal Opinion

Balazic v. Balazic

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 23, 2014No. 1 CA-CV 13-0435PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CATTANI, Judge:

¶ 1 In Glover v. Glover, 231 Ariz. 1, 289 P.3d 12 (App.2012), this court ruled that deficiencies in registration under Arizona’s version of the Uniform Interstate Family Support Act (“AUIFSA”), Arizona Revised Statutes (“AR.S.”) §§ 25-1201 to -1342,1 deprive Arizona courts of subject matter jurisdiction to modify a child support order from another state, even absent a timely objection to the registration deficiencies. Glover left unanswered, however, the question we now address: whether unobjected-to deficiencies in registration under AUIFSA deprive Arizona courts of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Health for Life Brands, Inc. v. PowleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  2. Glover v. GloverCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
  3. Magness v. Arizona Registrar of ContractorsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clarritt v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API