Legal Opinion

City of Riverside v. Weddle

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 29, 1976No. KCD 28467PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHANGLER, Presiding Judge.

The defendant Weddle was charged by Missouri Uniform Traffic Ticket with operation of a motor vehicle while intoxicated, in violation of ordinance. He was convicted in the municipal court.

On the trial de novo in the circuit court, the municipality commenced the prosecution by an offer in evidence of the Code of General Ordinances of the City of Riverside, with specific reference to § 9.17 [which prohibits operation of a motor vehicle by an intoxicated person] and § 17.01 [which defines the penalty for such an infraction]. The defendant objected that the ordinances…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. City of Rolla v. RidenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. City of St. Joseph v. RollerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  4. Schmitt v. City of HazelwoodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Kansas City v. BottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. FurneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  2. Queen of Diamonds, Inc. v. QuinnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. City of Kansas City v. MullenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. City of Lee's Summit v. CollinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. City of Boonville v. MartinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API