Legal Opinion

Mountain Supply Ditch Co. v. Lindekugel

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided April 15, 1913No. 3611PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Larimer District Court. Hon. James E. Garrigues, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.

From a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $1,225, the defendant appealed.

The first question presented by the assignments of errors is that the complaint does not state a cause of action. No separate demurrer was filed, but the sufficiency of the complaint was challenged by a clause incorporated in the answer, and the attention of the court was first called to it after the jury had-been empaneled and sworn to try the cause upon its merits. That practice has become customary in some sections of the state, but is not to be commended, either as to the manner of pleading…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miller v. Imperial Water Co. No. 8California Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Harrison v. HodgesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910
  3. Knowles v. Clear Creek, Platte River Mill & Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Geros v. HarriesUtah Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Hyink v. Low Line Irrigation Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Henderson v. KIRBY DITCH COMPANYWyoming Supreme Court · 1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API