Legal Opinion

Michael Bailey Jane Bailey Billy Bailey v. D.H. Kennedy D.B. Whitley Mike Crisp City of Hickory

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 20, 2004No. 02-1761Published

1Opinion of the Court

360 F.3d 470

Michael BAILEY; Jane Bailey; Billy Bailey, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

D.H. KENNEDY; D.B. Whitley; Mike Crisp; City of Hickory, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 02-1761.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Filed February 20, 2004.

1

On Petition for Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc.

2

Appellants have filed a petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc.

3

Judges Williams, Traxler and Senior Judge Hamilton voted to deny.

4

A member of the Court requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc. The poll failed to produce a majority of the judges in active service in favor of rehearing en…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Michael Bailey Jane Bailey Billy Bailey v. D.H. Kennedy D.B. Whitley Mike Crisp City of HickoryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
  2. Michael Bailey Jane Bailey Billy Bailey v. D.H. Kennedy D.B. Whitley Mike Crisp City of Hickory, Michael Bailey Jane Bailey Billy Bailey v. D.H. Kennedy D.B. Whitley Mike Crisp City of HickoryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API