Legal Opinion

State v. Ward

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 15, 1986No. KA-3757PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARD, Judge.

Michael D. Ward was charged with violating La.R.S. 14:72 by forging a credit application for Rosenberg’s Furniture Store. That part of the statute pertinent to this case defines forgery as “the false making or altering, with intent to defraud, of any signature to, or any part of, any writing purporting to have legal efficacy.” Ward filed a motion to quash the bill of information on the grounds that the credit application was not a “writing purporting to have legal efficacy” within the meaning of the forgery statute. The Trial Judge granted the motion to quash, and the State has…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BoassoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1886
  2. State v. RosboroughSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
  3. State v. JeffersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1887
  4. State v. StephenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Exchange Oil & Gas Corporation v. Great American Exploration CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  2. United States v. HopwoodU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
  3. Exchange Oil & Gas Corporation v. Great American Exploration CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API