Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
State ex rel. Campbell v. Eighteen Thousand Two Hundred Thirty-Five Dollars in U.S. Currency
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided April 8, 2008No. 104,016Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part
REIF, J.,
with whom WATT and COLBERT, JJ. join, concurring in part; dissenting in part.
€ 1 This Court granted certiorari to review an opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals that interpreted 63 0.8. Supp.2007 § 2-508(A)(7). This statute authorizes forfeiture of money found in close proximity to any amount of forfeitable substances. The Court of Civil Appeals interpreted § 2-503(A)(7) in affirming the dismissal of a proceeding in the district court of Bryan County, seeking forfeiture of money seized from Shawn Gandy.
T2 The controversy both in the district court and on appeal was whether…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. RomanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Russell v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Payne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1967
- State ex rel. Department of Public Safety v. 1985 GMC Pickup, Serial 1GTBS14EOF2525894, OK Tag No. ZPE852Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- State ex rel. Means v. One Million, Three Hundred Fifty-four Thousand, Four Hundred Fifty Dollars & Fifty Cents ($1,354,450.50) in United States CurrencyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.