Legal Opinion

State of California v. Donald J. Trump

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 2, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2019-0960Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 19-960 (RDM) DONALD TRUMP, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs—the states of California, Oregon, and Minnesota—challenge Executive Order 13,771 and the implementing Guidance issued by the Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) as violative of the separation of powers, the Constitution’s Take Care Clause, and the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”),

5 U.S.C. § 551

et seq. California and Oregon first moved to intervene in a parallel case also before the Court,…

2Cases cited37 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.