Legal Opinion
Whalen v. City Forester
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 20, 1932PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.
Four petitions for reinstatement by employees in the forestry department of the city of Waltham were filed. The pleadings in the case of Whalen alone are printed, but the bill of exceptions states that the four cases were “consolidated,” the facts relating to the four employees are stated in it, and the parties have argued questions as to all four so far as they differ. The proceeding is considered as it has been presented by the parties and as it was treated by the single justice. The four employees received notices on February 27, 1931, signed by the city forester, that they would be laid…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Whitney v. Judge of the District CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Peckham v. Mayor of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Hill v. Mayor of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
- McLaughlin v. Mayor of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
- Bois v. Mayor of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Daley v. District Court of Western HampdenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- Barnard v. City of LynnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
- Allen v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Codman v. Assessors of WestwoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Ullian v. Registrar of Motor VehiclesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.