Legal Opinion
Barber v. Bryant
District Court, S.D. Mississippi
Decided June 30, 2016No. CAUSE NO. 3:16-CV-417-CWR-LRA, CAUSE NO. 3:16-CV-442-CWR-LRAPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Carlton W. Reeves, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
The plaintiffs filed these suits to enjoin a new state law, “House Bill 1523,” before it goes into effect on July 1, 2016. They contend that the law violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. The Attorney General’s Office has entered its appearance to defend HB 1523. The parties briefed the relevant issues and presented evidence and argument at a joint hearing on June 23 and 24, 2016.
The United States Supreme Court has spoken clearly on the constitutional principles at stake. Under…
2Cases cited86 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stewart v. HeinemanNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- An Inquiry Concerning the Honorable Ruth Neely, Municipal Court Judge and Circuit Court Magistrate, Ninth Judicial District, Pinedale, Sublette County, WyomingJudge Ruth Neely v. Wyoming Commission On Judicial Conduct and Ethics.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2017
- Keyes v. GunnDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2017
- An Inquiry Concerning the Honorable Ruth Neely, Municipal Court Judge and Circuit Court Magistrate, Ninth Judicial District, Pinedale, Sublette County, WyomingJudge Ruth Neely v. Wyoming Commission On Judicial Conduct and Ethics.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2017