Legal Opinion
Farbenfabriken Bayer, A.G. v. Sterling Drug, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided July 15, 1957No. Civ. 908-55PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM F. SMITH, District Judge.
This is a civil action under the antitrust laws, and particularly Section 1 of the Sherman Act, as amended, 69 Stat. 282, 15 U.S.C.A. § 1, and Sections 4 and 16, of the Clayton Act, 38 Stat. 731 and 737, 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 15 and 26. The action is brought by the plaintiff, a corporation organized under the laws of Germany, as the “legal successor in interest” to certain rights of Farbenfabriken vorm v. Friedrich Bayer and Company, et als. The latter is hereinafter identified as “Friedrich Bayer and Company.” The Complaint charges that the defendant and others, not…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Frederick Hart & Co. v. Recordgraph CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Northern Kentucky Telephone Co. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1934
- Park-In Theatres, Inc. v. Paramount-Richards Theatres Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1950
3Cited by25 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Harold Friedman Inc. v. Thorofare Markets Inc. And Union Real Estate CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Cito v. Bridgewater Township Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- The Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery Corporation, the Hanover Shoe, Inc. v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Barnosky Oils, Inc. v. Union Oil Company of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.