Legal Opinion

Ball v. Clark

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1860PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL from the Tippecanoe Common Pleas.

1Per curiam

Suit on an account for work and labor. Judgment for plaintiff. Counsel say the Court erred in instructing the jury. The instruction states, briefly, “that in case of conversations between parties, the declarations of one party may be received and the other rejected.”

“The instruction should have been, that both should be weighed, and, if possible, reconciled with the facts in the case; and if not, then, that the jury were the judges of the weight to be given to each.”

Thus far from the brief of counsel.

The record says the Court gave the following instructions: “ The declarations of one party…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pierce v. GoldsberryIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Blessing v. DoddsIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Hess v. Biomet, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API