Leroux v. State

David Leroux appeals his convictions for unnatural and lascivious acts and lewd conduct in the presence of a child. We affirm his convictions, but strike one condition of the probation order.

Leroux argues that the order of probation — which prohibited him from owning a firearm, required him to pay for drug testing, and prohibited him from using intoxicants to excess and visiting places where intoxicants are unlawfully sold or used — contained conditions which had not been orally pronounced. We affirm the probation conditions which prohibit Leroux from owning a firearm, which required him to…