Legal Opinion

Henrichs v. Valley View Development

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 16, 2007No. 04-56470PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge.

This appeal stems from a quiet title action that began in Los Angeles Superior Court but was resuscitated in federal court after the California courts ruled against appellants John and Anne Henrichs (“Hen-richs”) on all issues. We consider whether the district court had subject matter jurisdiction over Henrichs’ claims arising from a California state court judgment rendered against him. After a series of real estate transactions among Henrichs, Valley View Development (“Valley View”), Marc Gel-man, Michael Blaha, and Granada Plaza Associates (“GPA”) turned sour, Valley…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court of the United States · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Dittmer Properties, L.P. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  2. Michelle Gilbank v. Wood County Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
  3. Benson v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  4. Shulkin Hutton, Inc. v. TreigerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Arellano v. LambornDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API