Legal Opinion

Utilities, Inc. v. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 6, 2000No. 101, Sept. Term, 1998PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELDRIDGE, Judge.

Maryland Code (1957, 1997 Repl.Vol.), Art. 29, § 3-107(a), provides that, in a condemnation action brought by the Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission (“the Commission”) against a privately owned water or sewage system, the jury shall deduct from the compensation award any contribution that lot owners or home buyers have made toward the construction of the private utility. These contributions, known as “contributions in aid of construction,” are a special kind of capital contributed by the developer of a new residential subdivision and passed through to the home buyer. 1

With…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Brohawn v. Transamerica InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Ashton v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. Katz v. Washington Suburban Sanitary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  4. Tanner v. McKeldinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
  5. Zappone v. Liberty Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. J.L. Matthews, Inc. v. Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  2. Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. Sprenger v. Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. Furnitureland South, Inc. v. Comptroller of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  5. City of Baltimore Development Corporation v. Carmel Realty AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API