Muller v. Ferry
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment rendered at special term in favor of the plaintiffs.
1Opinion of the CourtBarrett, J.
The main question presented by this appeal arises upon the defendant’s counterclaim. The plaintiffs are the assignees of one Mittimore with respect to a certain agreement whereby the defendant covenanted, upon a contingency which has happened, to give Mittimore certain shares of stock.
The plaintiffs, as such assignees, established their right to recover the value of these shares. Thereupon the defendant attempted to set off a demand which he claimed to have against Mittimore at the date of the latter’s assignment to *481the plaintiffs. The evidence offered hy the defendant in support of this…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Beveridge v. New York Elevated RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Shipman v. . RollinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Campbell v. . HallNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Cummings v. . MorrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- Carpenter v. . OsbornNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.