Legal Opinion

Brazinski v. New York Chiropractic College

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 7, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Coutant, J.), entered August 28, 2000 in Broome County, which, inter alia, partially denied plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery.

Plaintiff commenced this chiropractic malpractice action to recover for injuries allegedly sustained as a result of treatment rendered by defendant George Birnbach at the student clinic of defendant New York Chiropractic College. Plaintiff then served a notice for discovery and inspection seeking, inter alia, all documents relating to an investigation done by the College into his treatment, as well as all statements…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Logue v. VelezNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. KATHERINE F. v. State of NYNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. In re Donald MM.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Emigrant Bancorp, Inc. v. Commissioner of Taxation & FinanceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Smith v. DelagoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  3. Elmy v. City of AmsterdamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API