Legal Opinion

Southern Pacific Co. v. Blake

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 1, 1910Published

Error from the Sixty-First Judicial District, Harris County. Tried below before Hon. Norman G. Kittrell.

1Opinion

ON MOTION EOR REHEARING..It is insisted in the motion for rehearing -that “there was no evidence whatsoever offered or introduced, showing or tending to show, that the defendant, Southern Pacific Company, at the time of the alleged injury, or of the commencement of this suit, or at any time since and up to the present time, had or owned,, or has held or owned, or now has, holds, or owns, any property in the State of Texas subject to or within the jurisdiction of this court, the entire evidence being to the contrary.” The witness Cottingham, introduced by plaintiff in error, testified: “The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ward v. LathropTexas Supreme Court · 1854
  2. Wright v. RaglandTexas Supreme Court · 1857
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. GodfreyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  4. Battle, Heck & Co. v. CarterTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API