Legal Opinion

Kleiman v. Wayne Board of County Road Commissioners

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1953No. Docket Nos. 39, 40, Calendar Nos. 45,671, 45,670PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Dethmers, C. J.. The above suits, between the-same parties, for specific performance of alleged contracts for the sale of 2 different pieces of land, involve similar facts and identical questions. Plaintiff learned that defendant commission had the 2 surplus properties for sale. He made written offers to purchase, at specified prices and terms, accompanied by deposits of earnest money. In-the one case the-action of defendant commission was as folloAvs:

“Following discussion, Commissioner O’Haramoved tentative approval of this offer for posting.” Supported and carried.

In the other case:

“Followin…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schultz v. CarlsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Jacob v. Gratiot Central Market Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Presnell v. Wayne Board of County Road CommissionersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API