Legal Opinion

(PS) Olson v. Hornbook Community Services District

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 15, 2025No. 2:22-cv-02018Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KIMBERLY R. OLSON, No. 2:22-CV-02018-DC-DMC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 HORNBROOK COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the 19 Court is Plaintiff’s second amended complaint, ECF No. 10. 20 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by litigants who, as here, have 21 been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Under this 22 screening provision, the Court…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Michael Henry Ferdik v. Joe Bonzelet, SheriffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  3. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API