Bowering v. Adams
California Supreme Court
MOTION to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Lueien Shaw, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtTemple, J.
—This action was commenced by thirty-eight plaintiffs against one hundred defendants to quiet the right and title of plaintiffs to certain water, to the extent of seventy inches, miners’ measure. Many of the defendants defaulted, and among them the two appellants. In the decree the court determined that seventy-three of the parties to the action were the owners of all the water arising upon the land described, or which could be thereafter developed from the same, in the order and to the several amounts named in the decree. Of these parties thirty-five were plaintiffs and thirty-eight were…
2Cited by6 opinions
- T. C. Power & Brother v. MurphyMontana Supreme Court · 1902
- Granger v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- State ex rel. Jones v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Spokane Ranch & Water Co. v. BeattyMontana Supreme Court · 1908
- MacDonald v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.