Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Oklahoma

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided March 31, 1975No. Civ. No. 75-0169-DPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DAUGHERTY, Chief Judge.

This is a proceeding for a writ of habeas corpus by a state prisoner confined in the Oklahoma State Reformatory at Granite, Oklahoma, pursuant to the judgment and sentence of the District Court of Oklahoma County, State of Oklahoma, in Case No. CRF-74-410. The petitioner claims that his detention is unlawful on the following grounds:

1. That he was denied his 6th Amendment rights to confrontation and compulsory process.

2. That he was denied equal protection of the law in violation of the 14th Amendment because the three prior convictions used to enhance punishment…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Danny Ray Lamb v. Lozier BrownCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  3. Charles Blair v. The People of the State of California, Robert A. Heinze, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  4. Francisco v. GathrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Le Roy St. Clair Brown, Jr. v. Sherman H. Crouse, Warden, Kansas State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API