Legal Opinion

Dill v. Colonial Ins. Co. of California

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 28, 1990No. 89-569PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Colonial Insurance Company of California ("Colonial") filed an action against Kelli Rawlins Dill, Marilyn Rawlins, Brent Estes, and certain fictitious parties, seeking a judgment declaring that it was not obligated to pay any liability of Estes with regard to an action brought by Dill and Rawlins and that it was not obligated to defend him in that action. The trial court entered a summary judgment declaring that Colonial was "not obligated to defend or pay any liability incurred by Brent Estes arising out of the automobile accident involving Estes and other defendants." We reverse the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. American Liberty Insurance Company v. SoulesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  2. Southern Guaranty Insurance Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  3. Reeves v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Big Three Motors, Inc. v. Employers Ins. Co. of Ala.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. J.F. Morgan General Contractors, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2015
  2. Hackleburg Church v. Great Am. Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1995
  3. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. BullinDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API